AJHSE is currently ACCEPTING manuscript submissions. Submission Deadline: 16th JUNE, 2020. Click on Submit                                                                                                                         AJHSE is currently ACCEPTING manuscript submissions. Submission Deadline: 16th JUNE, 2020. Click on Submit

A QUANTITATIVE TEST OF THE PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF HEINRICH’S ACCIDENT PYRAMID

*Onwuka, C. | Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Columbia Southern University (CSU), Orange Beach, Alabama, USA.

  • Onwuka C.
Keywords: accident prevention, accident pyramid, ccident prediction, Heinrich, workplace safety

Abstract

Herbert W. Heinrich, a pioneer researcher in the field of occupational safety, published a book on occupational accidents in 1931. In the publication, Heinrich presented an Accident Pyramid, which affirmed that one workplace fatality would occur after 300 no-injury accidents have been recorded in a workplace. Heinrich’s Accident Pyramid has since been adopted as a standard for predicting the likelihood that fatalities will occur. Moreover, Heinrich’s claim on occupational accidents was adopted as a standard because of his reputation as a pioneer of occupational safety research. This study seeks to test the statistical hypothesis put forward by Heinrich in reference to General Aviation (GA) accidents and does so with a random subsample of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) data. Retrospective data published for public use by NTSB was collected from 2004 to 2013 for 15,119 GA accidents (with a mean fatal accident count of ≈ 282). The pyramid was initially recommended for use in predicting all forms of accidents, including GA accidents. Notwithstanding, the analysis of an independent variable x, the number of total accidents, and a dependent variable y, the number of fatalities, produced a p-value of approximately 0.821, which indicates no correlation between the variables. There was no statistically significant relationship found between the total number of accidents and fatal accidents, as asserted by Heinrich. This study, therefore, demonstrates that Heinrich’s Accident Pyramid is statistically invalid. Consequently, this means that a fatality may still occur even if the total number of accidents is reduced.

Citation

Onwuka, C. (2020). A quantitative test of the predictive validity of Heinrich’s accident pyramid. African Journal of Health, Safety and Environment, 1(1): 01-10. Retrieved on 5th February 2020, from https://www.ajhse.org/index.php/ajhse/article/view/18

References

Ale, J. Y., Andrew, R., Baksteen, H., Bellamy, J., Ben, J. M., Bloemhoff, M., Damen, M., Hale, I. A., Linda J., Mud, H., Papazoglou, A., and Whiston, M. L. (2008). The software tool Storybuilder and the analysis of the horrible stories of occupational accidents. Safety Science, 46(2): 186–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.002

Cambridge University Press. (2011). Standardized error and Japanese character: A note on political interpretation. World Politics, 2(3): 439-443. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2008914

Cooper, D. R., and Schindler, P. S. (2011). Business research methods (11th ed., pp. 15-27). New York, NY: McGraw- Hill/Irwin.

Creswell, J. W., and Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed., pp. 20-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. (1st ed., pp.34-49). Cambridge, MA: Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Manuele, F. A. (2011). Reviewing Heinrich Dislodging Two Myths from the Practice of Safety. Professional Safety56(10): 52–61. Retrieved on 18th October 2019 from https://www.worldcat.org/title/reviewing-heinrich-dislodging-two-myths-from-the-practice-of-safety/oclc/757583805

Marshall, J., Pablo, J., Alejandro, H., and Marcos, S. (2018). Heinrich’s pyramid and occupational safety: A statistical validation methodology. Safety Science 101(1): 180–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.005

Saloniemi, A., and Oksanen, H. E. (1998). Accidents and fatal accidents – some paradoxes. Safety Science. 29(1): 59-66. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00016-2

Stowell, R. (2007). The light airplane pilot’s guide to stall/spin awareness: Featuring the PARE spin recovery checklist (1st ed., pp. 57-60). Ventura, Calif.: Rich Stowell Consulting.

The British Standards Institution. (2008). BS OHSAS 18002:2008 (1st ed., pp. 23-31). London, United Kingdom: BSI Standards.

The Coca-Cola Company. (2019). Safety ABC’s always be careful (1st ed., pp. 13-15). Atlanta, ATL: The Coca-Cola Company.  

U.S. National Transportation Safety Board. (2013). General aviation 2013. NTSB json. 1(1): 1-2. Retrieved on 10th February 2020 from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/general-aviation-2013

Yorio, J., Patrick L., and Susan M. M. (2018). Examining factors that influence the existence of Heinrich’s

safety triangle using site‐Specific H&S data from more than 25,000 establishments. Risk Analysis, 38(4): 839–52. doi: 10.1111/risa.12869

Published
2020-02-05